Introduction

This project, completed as the final assignment of an Introduction to World History course, consists of 6 “episodes” meant to mimic the journalistic style of the podcast series, SERIAL. The episodes seek to explore the complexities of the events and issues surrounding the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012. The attack resulted in the deaths of four Americans, including Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. This series does not draw conclusions on fault or wrongdoing of the actors involved, but rather, seeks to deliver the facts of an event that is a vital piece of America’s modern history. 

As you advance through the episodes, the events surrounding the attack and its tremendous fallout should unfold before you.

Episode 1: From Dusk ’till Dawn

On the 11-year anniversary of the extraordinary display of terror on 9/11, U.S. Ambassador to Libya J. Christopher Stevens remained inside the compound of the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya in order to ensure his safety. This would prove to be a fatal decision. Shortly after turning in for the night, Ambassador Stevens and the compound would be under a fierce attack.

Continue reading

Episode 2: A Filmmaker, a Pastor and an Egyptian TV Host . . .

Two days before the attack on the Benghazi Mission, Ambassador Stevens met with leaders of Libya’s most significant militia leaders. In this exchange, Mohamed al-Gharabi, leader of the Rafallah al-Sehati Brigade advised Stevens that Benghazi was not safe for Americans, and later recalled, “I specifically told the Americans myself that we hoped that they would leave Benghazi as soon as possible.” This seemed contrary to some other sentiments expressed in the meeting, however, as the militiamen expressed their desires to create a relationship with the United States, more specifically, they asked for local additions of McDonald’s and KFC.

Continue reading

Episode 3: What Went Wrong

After the fall of Qadhafi, the U.S. administration planned to maintain a “light footprint” in Libya, leaving the Benghazi Mission in an ambiguous position, without a clear mission or defined status.  Because of this, the compound did not receive adequate security, personnel, or intelligence, leaving it incredibly vulnerable to attacks like the one on September 11.

Continue reading

Episode 6: Depth and Scope

American news is notorious for being tunnel visioned, focusing disproportionately on American issues and only giving non-western topics coverage when they affect the United States or have reached a certain level of international interest. In order to gain a broader picture of the contexts and perspectives related to the Benghazi issues. These international sources are able to present American and western readers with unfamiliar perspectives and expand the narrative of the Benghazi attack. This episode seeks to find new information from non-western sources.

Continue reading

Intro to World Politics: Course Reflection

This class has changed my perspective on the multitude of ways in which world politics can be approached, especially when thinking about theory. Before the class, I saw politics from my own perspective, and at times tried to consider others, but the concept of political theory wasn’t one I had ever explored. While I enjoyed seeing the ways in which theory tries to consolidate perspectives into categories such as Realist and Liberal, I still find politics a little too complex to be able to slot my own thoughts into either category.

The Benghazi project, in particular, made me acutely aware of how dependent I am on American and Western media to receive my news. I found it extremely difficult to find international sources outside of my comfort zone. In the future, I will need to make a more intentional effort to seek out alternate and broader sources.  I feel that I am knowledgeable of events that directly affect me and those that are covered in mainstream American and European media. I do not, however, have a satisfactory understanding or knowledge of international issues, specifically African, Asian, and South American issues. Those are incredibly large and significant parts of the world, so it is very regrettable that I do not know more about them.

The Benghazi Project also expanded my understanding of politics in the Middle East and North Africa. As these governments and political environments are wholly unfamiliar to me, I had to stretch my understandings in order to complete the project thoroughly. It also built upon my basic knowledge of the events of the Arab Spring, which I now know more about.

I do feel confident in my ability to evaluate the value and quality of a source. In this project, I tried to reach out to some sources I have never used before, such as government documents, but still found myself reaching for more familiar outlets such as the Times. Once again, in this area, I see that I have difficulty evaluating non-western sources because I find it more challenging to identify possible biases because I am unfamiliar with the politics and culture of non-western countries. I think that my confidence in finding good sources was fairly high before beginning the course, so I don’t think it has raised any this semester. From listening to SERIAL, though, I have begun to more greatly appreciate the value of a variety of types of sources, such as maps, interviews, and documents. These pieces of the podcasts were so helpful but also contributed to the level of reporting that was so high in SERIAL.

I feel that the topics covered in the course, coupled with the Benghazi Project and podcast responses, have influenced me to become more engaged in global affairs. Now, I find myself making connections between events and people that I would have never realized before. By gaining even a little bit more knowledge in unfamiliar political environments, I am able to explore more complex issues with more comfort and insight. Overall, the course was incredibly beneficial for developing my political thought.

css.php